Corporate Governance


Basic Views

The 花蜜直播app Group’s basic stance on corporate governance is to raise enterprise value through effective and sound management while forming solid relationships with all stakeholders, including shareholders, customers, employees, and communities, through highly transparent management practices. Our Group is striving to further strengthen and enhance corporate governance systems as appropriate for its businesses and scale.


Overview of Corporate Governance Systems

花蜜直播app is a company with an Audit & Supervisory Committee and has voluntarily established a Nomination Advisory Committee and a Compensation Advisory Committee as advisory bodies to the Board of Directors as a well as a Management Committee, an Executive Officers Committee, and other governance bodies. Our main deliberative bodies and their details are as follows.

Board of Directors

The Board of Directors comprises 13 Directors (of whom five serve as Audit & Supervisory Committee Members), and seven of the 13 Directors are Outside Directors (of whom three serve as Audit & Supervisory Committee Members), comprising a majority of the Board. In addition, the Company’s first female Internal Director (Audit & Supervisory Committee Member) was appointed to the Board in June 2024. Currently, five of the Directors are women and two are foreign nationals, providing a balance of knowledge, experience, and skills, promoting diversity, and creating a system that enables more multifaceted decision making. By avoiding having Directors serve concurrently as officers responsible for specific businesses (the internal company presidents, etc.), the Company seeks to enhance the separation of management oversight and business execution and thereby further reinforce the Board of Director’s oversight functions. Chairman of the Board serves as presiding officer pursuant to a resolution of the Board. In addition to deliberating on individual proposals submitted in accordance with the decision-making rules, the Board of Directors also discusses topics set based on the results of evaluations of the effectiveness of the Board. In fiscal 2023, the Board discussed issues including promotion of management that focuses on strengthening group governance, reinforcing compliance, promoting the advancement of women, capital costs, and stock prices. We also created a system whereby the Board adopts resolutions on fundamental policies on key management issues, such as sustainability, compliance, risk management, and quality control, and can request reports on the status of these issues from the business execution side. In addition to the above, the Nomination Advisory Committee and the Compensation Advisory Committee have been established for the purpose of improving the transparency and objectivity of its deliberations. The presiding officers and a majority of members of each committee are Outside Directors. The Nomination Advisory Committee deliberates on the policies and standards regarding the appointment and dismissal of Directors and the appropriateness of such, and the Compensation Advisory Committee deliberates on the policies and systems regarding the compensation of Directors and the appropriateness of the individual compensation, and reports or advises the Board of Directors, respectively.

Audit & Supervisory Committee

The Audit & Supervisory Committee comprises five Directors, including three Outside Directors. To secure effective oversight, the two Internal Directors have been appointed as full-time Audit & Supervisory Committee Members. To ensure the reliability of financial reports, at least one person with sufficient knowledge of finance and accounting is appointed to the Committee.

Business Execution Framework

花蜜直播app has adopted an executive officer system in order to facilitate response to rapid changes in the business environment. To accelerate decision making, a great deal of authority over business execution decisions is delegated to the executive officers, who are appointed by the Board of Directors. The Company established a Management Committee consisting of Representative Director, presidents of internal companies, and others as an advisory body to the President on overall Group management. The Committee deliberates on important matters related to business execution. The Company also established the Management Strategy Meeting and the Major Project Committee to engage in multifaceted discussions of strategies, action plans, and risk assessment and countermeasures for each business and project, thereby creating a system that enables more appropriate and efficient decision making and business execution. The Executive Officers Committee, chaired by the President and consisting of all executive officers, has been established. In addition to issuing business execution policies based on decisions made by the Board of Directors, the Committee also exchanges opinions on management issues in an effort to unify decision making in Group management.

Corporate Governance System Diagram (As of June 26, 2024)


Corporate Officers (As of June 26, 2024)

Name Position at the company Executive Independent Years of Service as a Director*1 Nomination Advisory Committee Compensation Advisory Committee Woman Non-Japanese National Board of Directors Meetings Attended*2 Audit & Supervisory Committee Meetings Attended*2
Yoshinori Kanehana Chairman of the Board 12 16/16 -
Yasuhiko Hashimoto Representative Director, President, and Chief Executive Officer 6 16/16 -
Katsuya Yamamoto Representative Director, Senior Corporate Executive Officer 7 16/16 -
Hiroshi Nakatani Representative Director, Senior Corporate Executive Officer 4 16/16 -
Jenifer Rogers Outside Director 6 15/16 -
Hideo Tsujimura Outside Director 4
Presiding officer

Presiding officer
16/16 -
Katsuhiko Yoshida Outside Director 2 16/16 -
Melanie Brock Outside Director 1 13/13 -
Nobuhisa Kato Director (Audit & Supervisory Committee Member) 2 16/16 14/15
Atsuko Kakihara Director (Audit & Supervisory Committee Member) New - -
Atsuko Ishii Outside Director (Audit & Supervisory Committee Member) 4
(7)
16/16 15/15
Susumu Tsukui Outside Director (Audit & Supervisory Committee Member) 2 16/16 15/15
Tomoko Amaya Outside Director (Audit & Supervisory Committee Member) New - -

*1 Years of service figures in parentheses for Audit & Supervisory Committee Members include years of service as Audit & Supervisory Board Members when 花蜜直播app was a company with an Audit & Supervisory Board. Note that 花蜜直播app transitioned from a company with an Audit & Supervisory Board to a company with an Audit & Supervisory Committee on June 25, 2020.

*2 Data on the number of Board of Directors meetings attended and Audit & Supervisory Committee meetings attended is for fiscal 2023.

Presiding Officer of the Board of Directors

The Chairman of the Board of Directors serves as the presiding officer of the Board of Directors.


Corporate Governance Functions (Organizations, Committees, Etc.)

Nomination Advisory Committee
Role An advisory body on policy and standards for the appointment and dismissal of corporate officers and such appointment and dismissal.
Composition

Presiding officer: An Outside Director

Members: Two Internal Directors and three Outside Directors, the latter of which includes one Audit & Supervisory Committee Member

Meeting frequency 10 times in fiscal 2023
Compensation Advisory Committee
Role An advisory body on the policy for and systems of corporate officer compensation as well as individual compensation.
Composition

Presiding officer: An Outside Director

Members: Two Internal Directors and three Outside Directors, the latter of which includes one Audit & Supervisory Committee Member

Meeting frequency Seven times in fiscal 2023
Management Committee
Role Assists the President as an advisory body with regard to Group management.
Discusses important business execution issues.
Composition

Presiding officer: The President

Members: Representative Directors, internal company presidents, and others

Note: The full-time Audit & Supervisory Committee Members participate in the committee as part of their auditing of business execution.

Meeting frequency Roughly three times a month (31 times in fiscal 2023)
Executive Officers Committee
Role Instructs about business execution policy based on management policy and management plans determined by the Board of Directors as well as information on important matters decided by the Management Committee.
Serves as a venue for communicating necessary and important information regarding business execution and for exchanging opinions.
Composition

Presiding officer: The President

Members: All executive officers appointed by the Board of Directors

Note: The full-time Audit & Supervisory Committee Members participate in the committee as part of their auditing of business execution.

Meeting frequency Twice a year (twice in fiscal 2023)
Sustainability Committee
Role Discusses and decides on measures to promote social, environmental, and Group sustainability.
Monitors adherence to such measures and the achievement of their aims.
Composition

Chair: The President

Members: Directors (excluding the Audit & Supervisory Committee Members and Outside Directors), internal company presidents, Director in charge of sustainability, Head Office division general managers, and others

Note: The Outside Directors participate in the committee so that the committee can glean the benefits of their external expertise and opinions and reflect them in its decision-making process. The Audit & Supervisory Committee Members participate in the committee as part of their auditing of business execution.

Meeting frequency At least twice a year (three times in fiscal 2023)
Company-wide Compliance Committee
Role Discusses and decides on measures to ensure thorough compliance throughout the 花蜜直播app Group.
Monitors adherence to such measures and the achievement of their aims.
Composition

Chair: The President

Members: Directors (excluding the Audit & Supervisory Committee Member and Outside Directors), internal company presidents, Director in charge of compliance, Head Office division general managers, and others

Note: The Outside Directors participate in the committee so that the committee can glean the benefits of their external expertise and opinions and reflect them in its decision-making process. The Audit & Supervisory Committee Members participate in the committee as part of their auditing of business execution.

Meeting frequency At least twice a year (twice in fiscal 2023)
Company-wide Quality Committee
Role Discusses Company-wide quality control policy and ensures its application.
Shares information about quality control among the Head Office, internal companies, and other related companies.
Composition

Presiding officer: The Senior Corporate Executive Officer in charge of technology

Members: Representatives from the Corporate Planning Division, Corporate Technology Division, related divisions of the internal companies and other related companies, and others

Meeting frequency Roughly four times a year (four times in fiscal 2023)
Management Strategy Meeting
Role Formulates and reviews management strategies and management plans for each business segment
Composition

Presiding officer: The President

Members: Representative Directors, internal company presidents, general managers of each internal company’s Planning & Control Division, and others

Meeting frequency Twice a year (twice in fiscal 2023)
Major Project Committee
Role Manages risk before bidding on and making investment decisions regarding major projects that could significantly impact operations and financial performance.
Evaluates the risks of projects and considers ways of addressing such risks.
Composition

Presiding officer: The general manager of the Corporate Planning Division

Attendees: Representatives of relevant Head Office divisions and the divisions handling relevant projects

Meeting frequency Held as needed

Director Appointment

Director Appointment Process

Candidates for Director are nominated by the Board of Directors in accordance with its established “Qualifications Expected of Directors.” As the Company has various business segments with different business activities, the Board of Directors appoints Internal Directors with broad experience as managers of each business and head office function, and Outside Directors with rich experience in corporate management, legal affairs, and public administration, respectively. As a result, the Company has secured a diverse Board of Directors, taken on the whole, with the needed balance of knowledge, experience, and ability, as well as gender, race, nationality, and other attributes, as summarized in the following table. The items listed in the skills matrix are based on the definition of the areas of supervision necessary to realize Group Vision 2030 as “vision, strategic thinking, and governance to increase enterprise value,” “business structure transformation,” and “growth initiatives related to infrastructure development.” To realize Group Vision 2030, the following areas* designate expectation and experience required of each director.

* An area in which the Board of Directors is expected to use its knowledge and experience to lead discussions.

Name Position at the company Areas of expectation Required experience
Business strategy Governance Finance and accounting Personnel & organizational management Monozukuri (technology, development, production & quality) Sales & marketing IT, DX & security Corporate management Global Legal & administration Finance & research organizations
Yoshinori Kanehana Chairman of the Board ? ? ? ? ? ?
Yasuhiko Hashimoto Representative Director, President, and Chief Executive Officer ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
Katsuya Yamamoto Representative Director, Senior Corporate Executive Officer ? ? ? ? ? ?
Hiroshi Nakatani Representative Director, Senior Corporate Executive Officer ? ? ? ? ? ?
Jenifer Rogers Outside Director ? ? ? ? ? ?
Hideo Tsujimura Outside Director ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
Katsuhiko Yoshida Outside Director ? ? ? ?
Melanie Brock Outside Director ? ? ? ?
Nobuhisa Kato Director (Audit & Supervisory Committee Member) ? ? ? ? ?
Atsuko Kakihara Director (Audit & Supervisory Committee Member) ? ? ? ?
Atsuko Ishii Outside Director (Audit & Supervisory Committee Member) ? ? ? ?
Susumu Tsukui Outside Director (Audit & Supervisory Committee Member) ? ? ?
Tomoko Amaya Outside Director (Audit & Supervisory Committee Member) ? ? ? ? ?

Director Appointment Criteria

Qualifications Expected of Directors

  1. Possess in-depth understanding and support for the 花蜜直播app Group’s management philosophy and vision.
  2. Be able to make positive contributions towards sustainable growth and the enhancement of enterprise value over the medium and long term.
  3. Maintain a Company-wide perspective and bring the wealth and breadth of experience, insight and expertise to do so.
  4. Be able to supervise the management and execution of business operations from an independent and objective position as a member of the Board of Directors.
  5. Be able to exercise one’s authority in an active and positive manner, and appropriately voice opinions at Board of Directors meetings or to management.

Note: To ensure the effectiveness of audits, Directors serving as Audit & Supervisory Committee Members must be familiar with the Company’s business or have deep insight and expertise in corporate management, legal affairs, finance and accounting, government and other fields. At least one Director serving as an Audit & Supervisory Committee Member must have sufficient knowledge of finance and accounting.

Independence Criteria for Outside Directors

If none of the following items apply, the Company judges that an Outside Director is sufficiently independent.

  1. In the event that a company (including an important subsidiary as defined by the Company) in which the Outside Director is currently employed or has been employed in the past 10 years as an executive director, executive officer, manager or other important employee (hereinafter referred to as the “originating company”) conducts business with the 花蜜直播app Group, the average transaction amount for the past five fiscal years exceeds 2% of the average net sales of the Group and the originating company for the past five fiscal years.
  2. The average amount of compensation (excluding compensation as an officer of the Company) received by such Outside Directors directly from our Group as a legal, accounting or tax specialist or consultant (or a corporation if the Outside Director has legal personality) for the past five fiscal years exceeds ¥10 million.
  3. The average amount of donations, etc. from the Group to the non-profit organization for which the Outside Director serves as executive officer for the past five fiscal years exceeds ¥10 million and exceeds 2% of the organization's total revenue or ordinary income/expenses.
  4. The company from which the Outside Director hails is a major shareholder holding 10% or more of the Company’s total outstanding shares.
  5. A relative within the second degree of kinship of the Outside Director is a person who meets the conditions set forth in the preceding four items or is an executive director, executive officer, manager, or other important employee of our Group.

The Effectiveness of the Board of Directors

Directors’ Terms of Office/Restrictions

Directors’ terms of office Directors 1 year
Directors (Audit & Supervisory Committee Members) 2 years
Criteria regarding restrictions on concurrent service as Director The Board of Directors stipulates that if a director of the Company is to serve concurrently as an officer of another listed company, the maximum number of concurrent appointments is limited to three companies excluding the Company. The Company discloses the status of concurrent positions held by each director in the notice of the General Meeting of Shareholders and in the Annual Securities Report.

Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Board of Directors

The Board of Directors strives to ensure that its members, including independent Outside Directors, engage in free, vigorous discussion based on their insights and experience and reach appropriate management decisions. As part of these efforts, since fiscal 2015, the Board of Directors annually evaluates and analyzes the effectiveness of its operations.

Efficacy Evaluation Methods

The evaluation was conducted via anonymous questionnaire to all directors with the advice and assistance of external experts. The specific evaluation procedure is as follows.

  1. Confirm the status of initiatives to address issues identified via the previous evaluation of the Board of Directors and determine evaluation methods to be used, key items to be surveyed and other matters pertaining to the upcoming evaluation
  2. Conduct a survey of all of the members of the Board of Directors
  3. Compile and analyze the survey results for discussion at Board of Directors meetings
  4. Determine issues to be addressed at Board of Directors meetings and policies for countermeasures based on findings from analysis and results of the Board of Directors’ discussion

Items Surveyed

The survey questions (main items) are as follows, with a 5-point scale and free writing section. Also, these questions take into account the changes made in the revision of the Corporate Governance Code while maintaining continuity with previous surveys.

  • Survey Question Items
  1. (1)Optimal status of the Board of Directors
  2. (2)Composition of the Board of Directors
  3. (3)Operation of the Board of Directors
  4. (4)Discussions of the Board of Directors
  5. (5)Monitoring function of the Board of Directors
  6. (6)Training
  7. (7)Interactions with shareholders (investors)
  8. (8)Actions by the respondent
  9. (9)Audit & Supervisory Committee
  10. (10)Summary

Evaluation Results and Results of Deliberation by the Board Based on Those Results

The analysis of survey results found that the Board of Directors’ operations were evaluated highly overall, as was the case in the previous year, and the additive average values for all questions (excluding the free writing section) were approximately the same as in the previous year. The item with the highest score was “Does the Board engage in free and constructive discussions and exchanges of opinions?” Many of the respondents highly evaluated the active and non-formal discussions conducted by the Board of Directors. Also, the item with the greatest score improvement was “Approaches and targets for ensuring diversity of core human resources such as promoting women, foreign nationals, and mid-career hires to managerial positions, human resource development policies, and internal environment development policies.” This result is recognition of the multiple discussions conducted during Board of Directors meetings and the actions taken based on the results of those discussions. In addition, among the items raised as issues for the Board in fiscal 2023, the score for “Securing diversity among core human resources” improved significantly, and this is believed to be the result of steady progress in discussions and action to address this issue. On the other hand, the item relating to “Overseeing the implementation of digital transformation” received the lowest score. As a result, it is desirable that the Board discuss management policies concerning the future and direction of the Company, including AI, recruiting human resources, and other issues. (For details of specific measures, refer to “Measures to Address Prior Issues.”) In light of these results, we will continue to make efforts for improvement.
Please refer to “Initiatives to Further Improve Effectiveness” for details.
As a result of discussions at the Board of Directors meeting based on the results of the above analysis and other factors, the operations of the Board of Directors have been deemed effective.

Measures to Address Prior Issues

The status of initiatives undertaken to address the items set as issues based on the results of last year’s survey is as follows.

  1. Firmly establishing leadership succession plans
    We created various lists including short and long lists of candidates and defined the succession process. We evaluated shortlist candidates from the perspective of competencies and incorporated the evaluations into the job and human resource requirement statements for each executive position. We are also clarifying development issues in the process of evaluating candidates and allocating challenging assignments based on those points as appropriate.
  2. Securing diversity among core human resources
    Within succession plans, we are investigating mechanisms that can select personnel from a pool of officer candidates through more diverse channels than ever before, and we are promoting the identification and promotion of diverse human resources on the executive level based on evaluation criteria (assessment of behavioral characteristics) with a focus on actions desired to achieve the Company’s vision. In addition, promoting the advancement of women is an important topic in terms of diversity, and the Board of Directors shared information on the current status and issues and discussed perspectives necessary for reinforcing promotion. Based on those discussions, we are investigating and have started implementing specific measures.
  3. Enhancing the content of the Board of Directors’ discussion regarding medium- to long-term management policies
    In fiscal 2023, management that focuses on strengthening group governance, reinforcing compliance, active participation by diverse human resources (promoting the advancement of women), organization of corporate principles, capital costs, and stock prices was raised and discussed as a priority issue.
  4. Strengthening group-wide internal control systems within quality control
    We promoted awareness among all employees by disseminating messages within the Company and conducting training through e-learning while taking action to identify issues at an early stage, such as conducting employee awareness surveys. In addition, we are promoting the application of total quality management (TQM) methods as a foundation for streamlining business processes so that we can effectively utilize TQM methods in business activities.

Initiatives to Further Improve Effectiveness

Based on the results of this evaluation and the discussions at the Board of Directors meeting, the main issues to be addressed are as follows. We will continue our efforts to further improve the effectiveness of the Board of Directors.

  1. Firmly establishing leadership succession plans
    We will make improvements while ensuring stable operation of the structures for the human resource hiring process currently in use. We will also raise the effectiveness of training plans for future successor candidates (executive positions) through dialogue with company presidents. In addition, we will continue to take action to instill competencies (behavioral attributes) in all officers while employing job and human resource requirement statements and conducting evaluations.
  2. Securing diversity among core human resources
    In fiscal 2024, we will continue our efforts to diversify the pool of officer candidates with a focus on a systematic developmental scheme for female line managers and on identifying and developing business exploration human resources. We will also deepen awareness of the importance of ensuring diversity in relation to achieving management goals including achieving our vision through the HR Management Committee and reflect this in companywide and division initiatives in the future.
  3. Enhancing the content of the Board of Directors’ discussion regarding medium- to long-term management policies
    At its meetings, the Board will continue to select and discuss topics in line with important issues for achieving Group Vision 2030, deploy the decided policies to the execution side, and further reinforce measures that will lead to specific action.
    (Priority Themes That We Plan to Investigate This Fiscal Year)
    Re-examination of business structures with an awareness of capital efficiency, active participation by diverse human resources, reinforcement of group governance, implementation of DX, intellectual property strategies, etc.
  4. Reinforcing monitoring of initiatives to promote quality and compliance
    In fiscal 2023, we continued efforts to reinforce company-wide quality management by streamlining and standardizing business processes centered on Total Quality Management (TQM), identifying similar matters relating to compliance, and taking other actions. We are also creating systems to eliminate misconduct and errors by reviewing Group governance systems and internal control systems.

Audits

Internal Audits

The Auditing Department, which is an internal audit division and consists of 19 persons, works to improve the internal control function by, for example, conducting regular audits to confirm that the 花蜜直播app Group’s execution of general business activities is properly conducted in accordance with laws and internal rules. Furthermore, the Audit & Supervisory Committee and the Auditing Department exchange information regarding their respective audit results and findings. The general manager of the Auditing Department reports the results of individual audits to the President and Audit & Supervisory Committee through audit reports and submits comprehensive reports to the Board of Directors and the Management Committee twice annually.

Audits Conducted by the Audit & Supervisory Committee

The Audit & Supervisory Committee comprises five Directors who serve as Audit & Supervisory Committee Members, three of whom are Outside Directors (independent directors specified in the rules of the Tokyo Stock Exchange) with no interests such as business dealing with the Company. Also, two Internal Directors are appointed as full-time Audit & Supervisory Committee Members to ensure the effectiveness of audits, and members with sufficient knowledge of finance and accounting are appointed to ensure the reliability of financial reporting. All Audit & Supervisory Committee Members including Outside Directors closely share information with one another to enhance the audit functions of the Audit & Supervisory Committee. In addition, the Company has established the Office of Audit & Supervisory Committee, which has two full-time employees, to assist the Audit & Supervisory Committee in the execution of its duties. The prior consent of the Audit & Supervisory Committee shall be obtained for any personnel changes, evaluations, etc. of these full-time employees, to enhance their independence from the executive directors and to ensure the effectiveness of the instructions of the Audit & Supervisory Committee. The full-time Audit & Supervisory Committee Members attend important meetings, such as those of the Board of Directors and Management Committee, voicing their opinions as needed. Through the above activities, they work to maintain the auditing environment, gather information within the Company, and build and regularly monitor the operation of internal control systems. The full-time members also share the information they collect internally with the Outside Directors serving as Audit & Supervisory Committee Members on a regular basis. The Outside Directors serving as Audit & Supervisory Committee Members attend meetings of the Board of Directors and, when necessary, other important meetings, such as those of the Management Committee, voicing their opinions as needed based on their respective expert knowledge. They strive to obtain the information necessary for auditing through the above activities and to maintain the auditing environment in cooperation with the other Audit & Supervisory Committee Members. They also share information with the full-time Audit & Supervisory Committee Members by such means as attending meetings of the Audit & Supervisory Committee.

Independent Audits

With regard to independent auditing, 花蜜直播app undergoes audits of its financial statements by the independent auditor KPMG AZSA LLC. The Audit & Supervisory Committee receives an outline of the audit plan and a report on important audit items from the independent auditor, and the Audit & Supervisory Committee explains its auditing plan to the independent auditor. The Audit & Supervisory Committee periodically receives reports on the results of audits by the independent auditor and, conversely, the independent auditor receives reports on the results of audits by Audit & Supervisory Committee, which strives to keep lines of communication open with the independent auditor by also exchanging information and opinions. When necessary, Audit & Supervisory Committee Members take part in the audits performed by the independent auditor, and may also receive reports from the independent auditor concerning audits when appropriate.


Director Compensation

The compensation system for Directors (excluding Audit & Supervisory Committee Members and Outside Directors) is based on the following basic policy with the aim of achieving Group Vision 2030, “Trustworthy Solutions for the Future,” established in November 2020.

Basic Policy

Placing stronger emphasis on contribution to the Company’s goals, the revised compensation system is designed to reward each recipient based on their responsibilities and accomplishments. To this end, it not only provides short-term incentives but also rewards Directors for their contributions to medium- to long-term improvement in corporate value. In this way, we aim to promote the sharing of value between Directors and stakeholders, including shareholders.

Compensation for Directors (Excluding Audit & Supervisory Committee Members and Outside Directors)

Compensation for Directors consists of basic compensation, short-term incentives, and long-term incentives. Basic compensation and short-term incentives are paid in cash. Long-term incentives are paid in the form of performance-based stock compensation to promote the sharing of benefits and risks between the Directors and shareholders in addition to more strongly incentivizing medium- to long-term contribution to corporate value. For long-term incentives, points granted may be revoked in whole or in part by resolution of the Board of Directors, in given circumstances such as when an eligible Director is dismissed or resigns due to damage caused to the Company. These three components of Director compensation account for approximately 50%, 30%, and 20%, respectively, of the total, assuming that the Group's consolidated operating results in the preceding fiscal year reached target levels and that each Director's degree of achievement of targets set for the preceding fiscal year is 100%.

Compensation Levels

Compensation levels are set appropriately, taking into consideration conditions at other companies and officer compensation survey data from an external specialized organization. Compensation levels for each position are generally as indicated below, with compensation for the Director, President, and Chief Executive set at 100.

Chairman of the Board: 87
Director, President, and Chief Executive: 100
Director, Senior Corporate Executive Officer: 65
Director, Managing Executive Officer: 44

Composition of Director Compensation (Excluding Audit & Supervisory Committee Members and Outside Directors)

Payment method Details
Basic compensation (fixed compensation) Cash Each Director’s pay grade is determined based on the missions assigned to them.
Short-term incentives (performance-based compensation) Cash Performance-based compensation is determined in line with single-year operating results and other indicators. Specifically, the amount of this compensation is determined based on consolidated operating results and the level of achievement of each Director’s individual performance targets. Profit attributable to owners of the parent is used as the indicator for assessing consolidated operating results, with the aim of providing incentives for the steady accomplishment of single-year operating results targets and promoting the sharing of value with shareholders. The payment ratio applied to this performance-based compensation is determined based on the profit attributable to owners of the parent for the year, as presented in (i), below. Details of the process for determining the level of achievement are presented in (ii), below. As one aspect of management that takes into consideration the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) and share price, the Group considers after-tax ROIC to be one objective indicator for determining the status of achievement of financial management objectives and sets the level of profit attributable to owners of the parent for the year based on after-tax ROIC.
Long-term incentives (fixed portion and performance-based portion) Stock Long-term incentives utilize a stock benefit trust and are determined based on fixed points granted to Directors in line with their periods of service as well as performance-based points granted for their accomplishments vis-à-vis individual performance targets. In principle, these incentives are paid to the recipients in the form of both Company shares and cash (the latter being in an amount equivalent to the value of a portion of said shares after conversion) at the time of their retirement as Director. Points granted are divided into fixed points and performance-based points. With regard to fixed points, value is shared with shareholders by granting a certain number of shares based on the term of service. Also, performance-based points are given as incentives to increase corporate value over the medium to long term by granting shares based on the degree of achievement of targets by each eligible director. The degree of achievement of targets by each eligible director is the degree of achievement of targets concerning medium- to long-term issues of the entire company and the organizations and business for which each director is responsible set for each director in the previous fiscal year. The proportions of fixed points and performance-based points are designed to account for 50% each when the recipient's level of achievement is at a standard level. For the time being, the ratio of the fixed portion and the performance-based portion will be set at 50%:50%, but in the future, the ratio of the performance-based portion will be raised to increase incentives to enhance corporate value over the medium to long term. Details of the process for determining the level of achievement are presented in (ii), below.

Composition of Director Compensation

* In the case where the Group’s consolidated operating performance in the preceding fiscal year reached target levels and each Director’s degree of achievement of targets set for the preceding fiscal year is 100%.

(i) Payment Ratio Based on Profit Attributable to Owners of Parent

Profit attributable to owners of parent Payment ratio (%)
Less than 0 -
0 to less than ¥25 billion 0 to 45
¥25 billion to less than ¥45 billion 50 to 95
¥45 billion to less than ¥70 billion 100 to 195
¥70 billion or more 200 or more

* Considering that current WACC is in the 4% to 5% range, the targets for profit attributable to owners of parent have been set at ¥45 billion, the level that will enable the Group to achieve after-tax ROIC commensurate with the WACC, and \70 billion, the level that will result in after-tax ROIC that exceeds the WACC by approximately 3%.

(ii) Process for Determining Level of Achievement of Individual Performance Targets

Setting of Targets

Each Director sets their own targets in terms of addressing short-, medium- and long-term issues, including those associated with business units and operations under their supervision and Company-wide issues, with the degree to which these are achieved reflected in short-term and long-term incentives. These include targets pertaining to important financial indicators as well as targets associated with initiatives aimed at realizing the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), efforts to improve employee engagement, and other aspects of non-financial performance. Targets for the short- and medium-term issues are as described below, and actions and achievement levels for respective targets to be implemented by each Director toward their realization are established.

  • Targets for short-term issues: Targets to be achieved by the end of the fiscal year
  • Targets for medium- to long-term issues: Targets to be achieved in light of Group Vision 2030

Methods for Assessing the Level of Target Achievement

The targets set by Directors are assessed at the end of each fiscal year, and the degree of achievement is reflected in compensation. The assessment of each Director is determined as described below.

  • President: All Outside Directors who serve as members of the Compensation Advisory Committee conduct individual, face-to-face interviews with the President and make a determination through deliberations among those Outside Directors.
  • Senior Corporate Executive Officers: Outside Directors who serve as members of the Compensation Advisory Committee conduct individual, face-to-face interviews with the Senior Corporate Executive Officers and make a determination through deliberations among those Outside Directors and the President.
  • Other Directors: The President conducts individual, face-to-face interviews with the individual Directors jointly with the Senior Corporate Executive Officers, and formulates an assessment through deliberations with the Senior Corporate Executive Officers, before referring the matters to the Compensation Advisory Committee for a decision.

Details of Revisions to the Director Compensation System

At a meeting held on May 9, 2024, the Board of Directors adopted a resolution to revise the compensation system for the Company’s Directors (excluding Audit & Supervisory Committee Members and Outside Directors) and executive officers as set forth below.

Details of revisions (applicable starting in July 2025)
Reinforced linkage with performance The ratios of fixed compensation accounted for by monetary compensation and stock compensation will be reduced to strengthen the link between compensation and performance.
New evaluation indicators set The targets relating to the highly effective employee ratio, ESG, and improvement in share price that until now have been set individually for eligible Directors will be set as common standards and reflected in performance-based compensation as independent evaluation indicators as indicated below.
Reflection in short-term incentives
  • Employee engagement indicators

    With the objective of drawing out even greater performance from human resources who work for the Company, the payment rate will be determined according to the ratio of employees who give high scores to both “supportive environment” and “employee engagement” in the Employee Engagement Survey. Payment rates will be set at 100% for levels in excess of the average score for companies in Japan in the previous fiscal year and at 200% for levels of the global corporate average score.
Reflection in long-term incentives
  • ESG indicators (CO2 reduction and third-party institution evaluation)

    To encourage overall ESG-related efforts including CO2 reduction, the payment rate will be set based on achievement of the Company’s CO2 reduction targets through our business activities and the provision of solutions for achieving carbon neutrality, taking into consideration a third-party institution evaluation (the Dow Jones Sustainability Index*1).
  • Share price

    To reinforce awareness regarding improvement of corporate value, the target share price will be made visible and incentives to raise the share price will be increased. The payment rate will be set each year according to the degree of achievement with the objective of bolstering measures intended to improve corporate value.
Composition of Compensation The ratios of basic compensation, short-term incentives, and long-term incentives within director compensation account for approximately 33.3% respectively of the total, assuming that the Group’s consolidated operating results and each indicator in the preceding fiscal year reached target levels, that each eligible Director’s degree of achievement of targets set for the preceding fiscal year is 100%, and that conversion is performed at the share price level at about the time of the May 9, 2024 Board of Directors meeting when the resolution revising the compensation system was adopted.

*1 A share index developed jointly by S&P Dow Jones Indices and RobecoSAM

Compensation of Audit & Supervisory Committee Members and Outside Directors

To ensure their professional independence, compensation for these individuals consists only of fixed compensation and is not linked with performance.

Methods for Determining Compensation

The total maximum amount of compensation for Directors (excluding Audit & Compensation Committee Members) is set by a resolution passed at the General Meeting of Shareholders. Within this limit, the amount of compensation is determined by the resolution of the Board of Directors based on the deliberations of the Compensation Advisory Committee. The presiding officer and a majority of the members of the Compensation Advisory Committee are Outside Directors. The Board of Directors may also resolve to entrust the President with the responsibility of determining the amount of compensation for each Director. In such cases, however, the President is required to honor the conclusions reached via the deliberations of the Compensation Advisory Committee and comply with policies regarding the determination of the amounts of Director compensation and methods for calculating such compensation. Compensation for Audit & Supervisory Committee Members is determined by deliberations among Directors who serve as Audit & Supervisory Committee Members.


Contact

If you need more information about our business,
please feel free to contact us.

CONTACT